Liam Broady vs Filippo Romano Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance of both players over the past six months, Romano has secured 46.48% of points, while Broady closely trails with a 46.47% success rate. This slight edge could prove significant, as second serve performance is often a reliable indicator of match outcomes.

When examining return games in recent form, Broady demonstrates a higher proficiency, winning 44.21% of points on opponents' second serves compared to Romano's 42.88%. In first serve returns, Broady also has an advantage, achieving a 29.06% success rate against Romano's 26.45%. These metrics strongly correlate with determining the favorite in head-to-head encounters.

In terms of saving breakpoints, Broady again outperforms Romano, recording a save rate of 57.64% compared to Romano's 55.71%. This factor is crucial for in-game betting strategies, as the ability to stay resilient under pressure often contributes to match outcomes.

Regarding overall performance, Broady has won 50% of their matches over the past year (W/L 19/19), with Romano slightly lagging at 48.21% (W/L 27/29). This marginal difference may be pivotal when assessing head-to-head predictions.

Surface preferences reveal Broady's strength on hard courts, boasting a 62% win rate (W/L 259/157), while Romano excels on clay with a 45% win rate (W/L 23/28). Conversely, Broady's weakest surface is grass, where he wins 36% (W/L 32/57), paralleling Romano's least successful performance on hard courts (36% win rate, W/L 5/9).

Their match histories in recent tournaments underscore the variance in levels they compete at. Romano primarily plays at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, achieving a 50% win rate (W/L 18/18). In comparison, Broady has been more successful in similar categories, winning 75% of such matches (W/L 15/5). This disparity in competition level must be considered when predicting the outcome.

The average rank of opponents faced over the last year is another telling factor, with Broady competing against players ranked roughly 347.37, while Romano has faced opponents with an average rank of 409.88. This differential suggests Broady has consistently challenged higher-caliber competition.

Looking at deciding set performance, Broady again holds an advantage, winning 50% of deciding sets over the last year, whereas Romano has only succeeded in 20%. This could be a key determinant in tightly contested matches.

Corroborating their relative performance under pressure, Broady has shown superior breakpoint conversion, capitalizing on 37.1% of opportunities, compared to Romano's 30.63%. This metric is essential for evaluating in-game situations where momentum swings can significantly affect the outcome.

Considering the analyzed statistics, Broady appears positioned to emerge victorious, offering strengths across multiple categories that are vital in competitive play.